Jun 30, 09:25 PM
The E.D. ads are riding into NASCAR town, and the townsfolk remain strangely silent
Posted by Cheryl Walker under Racing ArticleIn a previous column on the appearance of a Viagra ad during the NASCAR Cup races, I noted the return of these offensive ads (at least to some of us) and put out the suggestion to the NASCAR fans that we complain before more were welcomed in.
As I stated before, I am no prude. I do believe there is a time and place for everything, though. May I say that it is not an appropriate time to be discussing the topics included in a Viagra commercial during a Cup race on a Sunday afternoon? Imagine the living room full of family, including grandma and grandpa, enjoying the heck out of another exciting NASCAR race… and on comes the booming music that accompanies an ad that should only be on in the late evening hours? I am the same age as Mark Martin, but I still don’t want to have to focus on an ad like that with my parents in the room. I can’t imagine being younger and facing the same thing. How uncomfortable and awkward! I suppose it wouldn’t be so bad, but pharmaceutical companies need to be so specific about what the product is for, and what the side-effects might be. I would really prefer to be spared those details, and I am certain I am not the only NASCAR fan who feels that way.
In my previous column, I noted that if we didn’t speak up and say something, there would be more. Time has borne this out, and now instead of one ad during the race, we are up to three. Additionally, Viagra now sponsors something they call the ‘Viagra Moments That Changed the Game’. May I say that with each added moment of E.D. commercials, we are changing the family-oriented landscape of our race broadcasts? What will be next? Will we also have the innocuous ads of happy couples in matching bathtubs; or worse, the ads for faux doctors selling faux products promising to make physical changes that real doctors say are impossible? Anyone who winces at the spam emails that claim the same should take a moment to consider how it would be if the same were happening on the television screen during a NASCAR race. Who in their right mind would want that?
Yes, advertising during race broadcasts are necessary. They send their messages about their products to us; and, in turn, our silence about offensive ads sends the message back that it is okay with us.
If such ads don’t bother you, then their sure-to-increase numbers if no one says anything probably won’t either. But if you care about these varmints coming into our town, you’d better speak up to your ‘local sheriff’ (a.k.a. the broadcast networks), and the sooner the better.
-
Larry Says:
Jul 1, 05:28 AMI guess it is more acceptable to have “feminine hygiene” products through the dinner hour…if you want to dictate morals, then there will always be someone that is offended by something
-
K45PettyFan Says:
Jul 1, 05:46 AMIt wasn’t Viagra specifically- his sponsor was Pfizer, the company who makes Viagra, so the focus was (allegedly) on “men’s health” rather than ED. And I agree with Cheryl-any broadcast that claims to be “family friendly” should skip the ED ads.
-
caw Says:
Jul 1, 08:30 AM2/12 Car Fan – Yes, I did remember that. But as K45PettyFan remarked, the information was not blasted in my face in detail multiple times during a race. With details about such things as four-hour… well you know.
And Larry? I addressed the issues of other offensive ads in my first article. I don’t believe they belong around either. An interesting fact, though: In all the time that I have been keeping track, there has not been one ad for a feminine hygiene product during a Cup race.
Again I say… if we don’t say something, there will be surely more to come. And perhaps Larry they will imagine we DON’T mind the feminine hygiene ads either.
- Cheryl
-
Kevin Says:
Jul 1, 10:06 AMI agree wholeheartedly with Cheryl. Unfortunately, there isnt much we as fans can do. It is obvious that lately, NASCAR cares little about what the long-time fans think.
-
Diane Says:
Jul 1, 10:07 AMI will never watch a race live and one of the main reasons are the ED ads. So, because the networks can’t find 2 to 3 other companies to buy ad time I miss all other commercials. Therefore, THOSE companies lose out on me and my famly as potential consumers. While I would prefer those commercials (and feminine hygiene ads) did not exist, they should be shown on shows where adults are the viewers, not children. (Fox News Channel also airs those ads, even on morning shows!)
Diane
-
dawg Says:
Jul 1, 10:17 AMAs long as Derick Cope doesn’t have the audacity to try to put Redneck Junk. As a sponsor on his under funded car. The NA$CAR Cops, (closley related to the Keystone cops) stopped that one fast enough. As they say, “Different strokes, for different folks”
-
John Says:
Jul 1, 10:48 AMCheryl,
It gets worse: My local cable company (Bright House Networks) slots ads for a local porn “factory outlet” during NASCAR broadcasts.
BTW, I too, hate the ED drug ads. But do you think that Allstate ad with Kasey Kane in his Budwiser driving suit; posing in front of his Budwiser Cup car; being rear-ended by the “Allstate Girls” might just be a tad strange and offensive, too?
-
Sharon Says:
Jul 1, 11:06 AMAny ads concerning “bodily functions” belong in mags if anywhere
-
Robert Says:
Jul 1, 12:09 PMJohn, I to have to put up with the “factory outlet” ads. I have to keep the remote in one hand while watching the races as I have a 10 year old boy and 6 year daughter that love sunday afternoons watching racing. I have always felt that individuals in need of certian “Adult” products of any type (e.d. medication, feminine hygine, or any other product that is sexual in nature) know what products are available and where to find them. The FCC should not allow television advertising of “Adult” content on television. They have already banned tobacco ads from television. So it is not ok for kids to see a Marlboro Ad but it is ok to give then directions to the “Adult Factory Outlet”. I have written to the FCC with this statement as well and have been ignored.
-
Ron Says:
Jul 1, 03:22 PMWell I’m older than you and Mark Martin. When He was sponsored by Viagra there was no problem. He handled the kidding very well. And I accept it as a way to improve life.
Your parents probably deal with it better than you.
-
Terri Says:
Jul 2, 03:43 AMI don’t like the ads, either. And I also figure that the guys in those ads aren’t the ones who are really needing Viagra, anyway. And why are their wives always younger and very pretty? Please, have you seen most old folks today?
-
Tommy Thompson Says:
Jul 2, 09:40 AMCheryl’s point was simple enough to understand. There is an appropriate time and place for most anything. And if NASCAR wants to attempt to maintain a family friendly sport probably promotions of ED medications, condoms and those cheesy late night “Hook Up” phone dating services seen late at night does not fit with that goal. How about “Girls Gone Wild” commercials during Disney’s Hanna Montana airings? Is that cool too?
Commercial breakdown, driver focus, and links related to the LENOX Industrial Tools 301 Moment-by-moment breakdown of TNT’s Wide-Open-Coverage of the Coke Zero 400

Jul 1, 04:00 AM
I guess you don’t remember when Mark Martin was sponsored by Viagra back in 2000-2003?